Thread:SOLONM/@comment-26422322-20150930024713/@comment-24668482-20150930063052

Pam is correct. But if so many other people have read something different into that paragraph then it must be unclear. So I am very much open to suggestions as to how to change the original:

"Note that 'removing all charges' in order to be able to 'receive more charges' is a band-aid to a problem that suggests that the best way to be able to visit to a LBS players is to never visit the LBS player, which isn't a solution at all."

So that it is not open to such misunderstandings.

I was trying to be diplomatic so as to not insult anyone who does find that method useful in unlocking their board, as if it works for people then that is great. I just feel that clearing all charges is not a long term solution or that feasible for players who can't play multiple times a day to keep charges down. And I worry that in the end people will suggest something like not visiting so as to not fully charge (and therefore lock) a board, which would completely defeat the purpose and just make things more disenfranchising for players with the problem.

Anyway, tell me how to make it clearer and I will. Because the alternative of saying nothing to me and then stating that 'Foss mentions not visiting LBS players' is putting some seriously offensive words and ideas in my mouth.