Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-29205531-20170531032043/@comment-29954643-20170531091529

Ok, RB, I think that I've finally read everything on the Noms thread and Sannse's wall. Although, I thought that it was clear where and what is currently in question, that Nom thread does seem to be wandering. I think that GEL did try twice to veer those AAA supporters over to Sannse's wall to continue to discuss the question of whether AAA should, could or would be added to the nominations board, and I've read Sannse's wall, so some have begun to do that, yet there still appears to be some who are not following GEL's guidance. Hopefully, that will be stopped.

As far as the currently posted Noms board. I must say that I find it unnecessarily confusing too. This is not any kind of election. No one is running against anyone else for any particular role. I would find it less confusing if that were clarified.

1. None of the current 'staff' (for lack of a better term) have decided to relinquish their role 2. Given that, why are their names even listed? 3. I would prefer to see all of the nominees, past and present, with a note to reflect their current status. (accepted), (declined), or nothing if neither of these have been determined. 4. Whatever happened to Lidewey? I thought at the very least she was still considering. Have I missed the plot on that one? Was it discussed on someone's wall? Who knows? 5. When exactly do these nominations end (Date/Time). I think that should also be clearly stated so those who may still be considering do not miss some vague deadline. 6. When exactly (Date/Time) will the new voting discussioon be opened and when exactly, will it close.

Why this has morphed into an election of any kind is just simply beyond me. :--)) - El