Thread:Sannse/@comment-27294075-20170522193407

Sannse - in light of the current turmoil on our wiki, I come to you for advise on a most delicate situation.

While everyone has been taken each other apart, I have indeed been ill but working a little also. I requested a CheckUser and received an answer from semanticdrifter, May 22, 2:47 PM UTC. The check was run because … "Because this does appear to involve some vote-rigging, I have gone ahead and run the checks."

The user in question came back positive for the same IP number being used twice on our wiki. My main concern is that this same user is working very closely with a current member to obtain Bureaucrat rights on our wiki. The member in question for these rights was emailing me about obtaining the rights and I asked this member to stop emailing me......on the member's wall. Transparency..😊

Here's where transparency has become a very grey area for me. While semanticdrifter has advised me of my options of a ban on this same IP double registration user, there is also a "paper trail" with this user to a user who has been banned for life.

So my conundrum? How much transparency is used here with such a troubled wiki? How do I tell them all this about the member/user seeking Bureaucrat rights who may not be trustworthy?

Thank you for your ear. 