Thread:Katlovr/@comment-32899062-20180313011012/@comment-29954643-20180314022404

Wow, sort of chastised by everyone now. Does anyone understand my concern? Please try to get around your perception of my tone as I simply have a sharper way of writing. I try to be clear and have to use so many words to soften my point which then get lost in the prose.

I would prefer for editors to discuss amongst themselves who is currently working on what in an open forum where a member is not being asked not to post any further on a particular member's wall. I have had edits stepped on already here more than once in recent days (and I am not talking about Kat in any way) and I know this was done without malicious intent. But that is what happens when too much is assumed to be the property of a single editor.

This is the beginning of collaborative editing here, so let's please understand that if you are not editing then you may not exactly understand what is being agreed to. You may or may not like my style, but it is also being said to avoid future misunderstandings which are surely going to come about as more members join into editing the content.

Yes, there is much to do, but I have found that wherever I start to edit, someone bounces in and completes the work for me. Please try to understand that I am not talking about anything from last year. I am speaking to the current and immediate editors. Just be careful. If I am saying this, others have felt the same. I risk being the bad person for voicing my concern and if an editor's wall is off-limits to me, then we need to get off of private walls.

As a matter of fact, I was thinking about possibly taking on the next update's stubs, but that has apparently already been assigned. Are all future collections stubs to be done by one editor? I think wikipedia is calling to me again. I will not post further here at the request of Kat, so if you have something further to say to me, please post it on my wall. Thanks  - El