Thread:MDbugs/@comment-29259087-20170711162602/@comment-29259087-20170712222313

In my opinion, an action as serious as blocking should require a unanimous decision, rather than a majority. Both for the block and for the length of time of the block. Kinda like how serious decisions in the US Congress require a "super majority." (Not that I'm in any way comparing these two things...just the only example I could think of.) I've no idea if that would make a difference with the current situation, and that's not my point anyway. It's much easier to defend such a serious administrative decision and goes a long way toward impartiality if a unanimous decision is required. I've thought about bringing this up to the community for a vote. Do you think this idea has merit?