Thread:Only8/@comment-32899062-20180324165059/@comment-29954643-20180324180347

Sara, until you posted on that works in progress page, editors had only posted 'completed work'. I never look at that page because of that, but I did happen to notice your post. Are you sure that Only8 ever saw your post? I believe that the everyone is antsy because the last update was really small, and we are all waiting to 'pounce'. Do you really think that 8 did this deliberately?

I realize that your outrage is really directed at me, so come, have at me instead. We are all trying to get the hang of 'true' collaboration. And I think that Rain and I have communicated about the single 2018 history page starter (where an image that I had just put on that page (that I created) right after I put it there. I don't think Rain did this maliciously either and I explained the problem, but this was a single page and I thought that is was OK now. Your current project has to do with all of the pages associated with 2 broad subjects and many pages

Artefact association to collections - initiated Scene levels added to collection pages - initiated

OK, so you have decided that these edits to all individual collection pages are yours. Recently there has been a discussion (on walls) about the need to add this information so it isn't surprising that others will see the missing info, remember those discussions and edit a single page. The same was true of the decision that we should add the correct picture opening level after an event is over to each pictures pages. I did a few, Okapi did a few and others have as well as we find the missing info on a particular page. I did not take 'dibs' on this concept for all pages.

I know that the Works in progress page is a problem but I doubt that 8 is lying about not having read that comment from you on the Works in progress page. Do you honestly think that? If not, was this necessary or could you have come here and try to negotiate the workload? - El