Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-30544675-20180321151107/@comment-29954643-20180321201508

Oh, sorry, Podaci. It seems that my previous post was cut-off for some reason and I didn't notice it until now. I don't remember what else I was saying but it doesn't close with my signature, so I know it got cut off.

Well, I still disagree. I think that the Artefacts page is OK as it is and the one-off artifacts (meaning they are not permanently in the Artefacts tab) are in their own section, so I don't see the confusion there. In fact, I believe it would be more confusing to move them to their own page. The one-offs happen because they are removed from the Collections/Artefact tab often during the update following a particular event. Taking them off the Artefacts page and putting them on this 'other' page is more difficult than just relocated the Artefact within this one page. I'm not sure how many use this page very often. Have you gotten complaints about this page's load times? The problem is that tables with images in them are not conducive to Fandom's table system, but these are already in separate tables so I don't see that a new page would help that. It would just be two pages that load slowly.

An Artefact can be either an Amulet or a Talisman, but if it is made by combining in the Actefacts tab, then they are either an Amulet Artefact or a Talisman Artefact. The fact that these can only be combined during a particular update is not relevant.

What needs to happen (based on that other thread that I did find for myself) is that the applicable Event page and the Individual Collection Page needs to be clearly tied to the Artifacts that can be created based on that event. I don't see another problem, but RB is the one that has spent countless hours on these Artefact pages. - El