Thread:Sannse/@comment-30567431-20170727183009/@comment-8-20170728161547

AAA is correct that anything that has been broken can be fixed. Every version of an article is stored in the history and can be brought back with just a few clicks.

As I've said before, protection is not a problem if used in moderation. If you think a page is particularly at risk of vandalism, then it can be protected. The main page is traditionally one that's protected, as it's the "face" of the wiki.

Katlovrno1 wrote: Remember how we were going to work on assignments for editing? I don't believe that would work. Why would I spend my leisure time editing pages that have been assigned to me? I want to do things that I find fun and interesting. If I had been assigned to write an article on Wikipedia I probably would have left. I'm a typo fanatic, I'd rather fix hundreds of them than create a single article 🙂

MDbugs wrote: I  am  following  my  heart. I  am  listening to the community. I  am  trying  to  move  forward.

Yes! This is what I would love to see from everyone here.

Katlovrno1 wrote: Very mature MD. Thanks. This is a good example of something that can be "heard" in two different voices. From the context, it seems to be sarcastic, but I prefer to think of it as a genuine olive branch.

I honestly don't know how you are going to get through these differences of opinion and style, and what seems to be a big lump of hostility. The fundamental disagreement seems to be a matter of control vs. laissez-faire. I fall firmly on the laissez-faire side of things, I believe in the wiki way of many people getting together to create something beautiful. Have a look at some of the bigger wikis. Runescape is the number one rated wiki right now. And every page was built in collaboratively with many people creating an awsome wiki together.

Talking of ranks, this wiki's rank is 315. There have been over 300,000 wikis created, so that's a great score. Last month there were nearly 15,000 visitors here, with well over 200,000 page views. These are the people you are writing for. Surely that's more important than disagreements between yourselves.