Thread:Sannse/@comment-27643406-20170718213611/@comment-29259087-20170724161927

Katlovrno1 wrote: AGAD, you had a chance like everyone else to step up to the plate when new Admins were nominated and voted in. The fact that you didn't speaks volumes in your own actions, therefore I respectfully request you leave the difficult decisions to the Admins that were elected by the majority. In fact, I did speak up in several threads around that time, and I also voted. You're welcome to check my contribution history if you'd like. If you're implying that I should have volunteered for an administrative position in order to have any kind of opinion or say in "difficult decisions," then that would apply to nearly all of the members of what is supposed to be a community-maintained wiki. In my post, I simply re-iterated some of the concerns that were raised by Karen in the post that started this whole thread. Concerns that have yet to be addressed. Katlovrno1 wrote: I'm sorry you don't like MFB's block but the decision was made with much research and no personal feelings involved. It is clear that none of you will be happy with any decision made and want to run this wiki yourselves. The fact remains that none of you want peace either or you'd stop all this bickering. I must disagree with your assessment that no personal feelings were involved. Our personal feelings and biases and opinions are involved with every interaction and with every bit of research that's done. No one is free from it, unless perhaps you're a robot. We're all human and beautifully diverse, and none of us are able to make decisions without our experiences and interactions shaping those decisions. The first step in making an informed and balanced decision is acknowledging your own personal bias. It concerns me that you have not made that acknowledgment. Katlovrno1 wrote: Once all this stops perhaps we'll be able to work together. It can stop beginning with you. Should you continue I will know where you stand regarding peace. 😺 It could also be said that you don't want peace, or you'd speak to our concerns constructively, rather than ignoring them or attacking those who speak up with an opinion counter to yours. Your opinion on how to get back peace does not match with mine, and assigning desires to me based on your opinion is flawed (just as my first sentence is flawed by saying you don't want peace since you continue to ignore our concerns). I dearly want peace; I want back what we had before Foss left.