Thread:Sannse/@comment-27643406-20170718213611/@comment-26384327-20170723060708

Betty2015 wrote: Anonymous Seeker - it is important because you sound like AAA. At one point, you were the one controlling all of the editing. You were the bureaucrat.

You left this place, and then you continue to come back and deliberately try to sabotage any efforts to move forward. Betty2015 - you should know as well as GEL, in fact, most of you should know, that masking my identity is not my style. I shoot straight from the hip. If I have something to say, good, bad or indifferent, I am going to say it, and everyone will know that I said it.

Have I ever been less than straight-forward and honest with you during our conversations? That was not a rhetorical question. Just because I have stepped down as Admin/Bureaucrat hasn't prohibited me from commenting from time to time when I feel it is appropriate. I can assure you and whoever, I do not spend my time combing through the myraid of posts to see which one or ones to respond to. I stumble upon them as I did this one.

As I said once before about being disappointed, I am disappointed in you that you made such an accusation.

But note, like so many others on this Wiki, I ain't hatin' on you nor them.

Note also that everyone has the right to be Anonymous (remember, the Wiki put that to a vote). I will not bring up again why I thought they shouldn't be anonymous, though it had nothing to do with posting messages. My feeling has always been to encourage people to create an identity, but I never suggested that they sign "their" name to a post, because in the big picture of the Wiki and the game, it would serve no purpose, especially if they elected to sign a different name each time the posted something.