Thread:Karendu1/@comment-29954643-20180417060714/@comment-29954643-20180417210732

Honestly, I know. There was never, as far as I know, a formal naming convention in a document, which is what you are looking for. It isn't there. It isn't anywhere, as far as I know. So, what we all have to do is to research the other 'similar' items. The game does have a repeating style. So, my example above pointed at the Special Items page where all of these demand thingies are ultimately brought together in one place. That is where it has been tricky to discern the standard. But when you look through them, you may find a few exceptions but the idea was to use the new item name followed by Special item.

Of course, there may be time between major updates to really get a naming convention settled upon, but in the mean time, I've been leaning toward researching how they have been named (especially if a solid trend seems apparent and reasonable).

Recently,  I have had some concerns. We just all need to remember that those of us that do edit are are a small group (relatively speaking), and there really is still a problem with who and where to communicate a concern. I take them to the source  or where I find that we may be going down a disjointed path.

Honestly, I am trying to find a balance between structure and editing freedom. It is a tough median to find.

If you don't agree with my thoughts about this particular item (the demand thingy for this event picture (Fan)), then so be it, but we run the risk of all editors naming images with their own naming convention. This is great in the personal image part of the image database, but the article images have to be more wiki global. Your idea, while it may seem logical will then need to be duplicated in the future were Fans to be used again for another event's demand.

I hope that you understand what my concern is all and only about. Thanks for replying - El