Thread:Greeneyedlady007/@comment-28482541-20180430030956/@comment-27294075-20180507044700

Mainframebabe wrote: HERE I believe is the offensive and awful post that GEL seems to think that I knew that she had reported me to, I assume, AAA. He did not tell me that. I had no problem with the word change, and I will note that Terri had no problem with my post at the time either, but I did have a problem with the comments that followed by Boo. See Boo's profile at the very time that GEL chose to report my use of a word. Judge for yourselves whether this is the pot calling the kettle, well you know the adage.

GEL, I knew nothing about your association with Boo back then.I learned of that relationship later. I took exception to your mean spirited gift on Christmas Eve of 2016. You seem to like messing with me on Christmas Eve. Seems especially mean to pick that date of all dates

I am as tired of this as you all must be, 4. Probably even more tired given the lifespan of this problem. You and I are not close friends, 4, but neither are most of the admins even if it seems otherwise. I thought about sending this in a private email, but decided against that. I would not like to be further accused of something I haven't done. I would like to out my own behavior and provide actual links to my misdeeds and let others decide for themselves if they read this at all. If not, then it is posted here for posterity I have no real skeletons in my closet. I gossip too much, for sure. I will be more careful of that in the future.

As far as last year's warning from GEL. It was the first time I was made aware that I was in trouble here. It was a 2 page message. Funny thing, this all came within hours of my name being placed on the nominations board in 2017. GEL refused to provide links to MY posts, but instead sent  me to her wall to read a rather strange complaint letter about Imskrak's fear of my 'Black Magic' and my disrespect toward those of different nationalities. Gosh that last bit had me stumped for a while until I found the only possible and 'completely OK' post where I answered the question about why there was a nomination process at all. I was merely trying to explain the term 'nomination' as it is in U.S. system of placing candidates into official contention. Nothing at all controversial.

And, GEL, yes, you closed the thread on me on my own wall and I had said nothing but ask for links to my posts. According to you, no proof or discussion was required. As for member walls, I suppose that I didn't realize that I wasn't allowed to post on whomever's wall. GEL is talking about, but I assure you, I have not posted on Imskrak's wall as far as I remember,  but I shall never, trust me. I fear posting on anyone's wall unless they have come first to my wall. But, now, at least I trust that the admins intend to be more fair than 2 admins were in the past.

Both Lissa and Dag both was upset that their names were used against me, so who was left that GEL named as those I had transgressed against. Imskrak, the poster of the nasty profile image of an 'evil devil coming out on sleazy tongue'. To me it was a religious obscenity but deemed acceptable to this wiki, and the 'rotten tomato throwing' plan and Boo? The whole thing felt orchestrated and I was indeed worried when GEL went immediately to Sannse's wall and asked if I could be blocked. Sannse suggested that it might not look good given the nominations board. Look Bad? It was obscene. Thankfully, now, complaints have to be backed up with facts, like links to my wrong doing. This is the reason why we can't ever assume that an admin block was done fairly in the first place. I'm sorry, but I choose to rely on the election process and this final oversight just in case a member is targeted as I felt that I was. No one can give me back my streak (331 days). No one can give me back those 3 months. That time is gone.

I ask that this be stopped soon. What I do today is the worst that I have ever done on the wiki. Coco says 'Shut Up' to me and ZERO warnings. It is her right to have an opinion. Not so nice for it to be so personal, but fine. But, I take exception to being told outright to 'Shut Up'. There are quite a few that I would like to say that too, but I haven't and I won't no matter how much I am pushed around here with personal comments on my degree of 'niceness'. Absurd - El

P.S. Sannse's comment has been taken out of context. When I asked her privately, I thought, what was I to do about the threats that seem to be coming at me by GEL, Sannse said to just stop the Forum chatter and start editing the content, which I did. That is when the edit nitpicking started happening. I was Kat's special project. GEL seemed to nitpick everyone else. Nitpicked them right out of here for the most part. Oh, that is right, Karen is still here. Not a close friend but someone that knows what it is liked to be pushed around by GEL. Not AAA, GEL. Blaming everything on AAA isn't right. GEL didn't have to continue in the same vein of ZERO community discussion and policies just put in place without community oversight. It is different now. And I applaud your efforts, all of you.

preserving the unedited.🦉