Thread:Redbeard99/@comment-27294075-20171109224724/@comment-29205531-20171111054400

Sorry, have had RL issues..

Is the word bakery copywrited ? No... I made no mention of anything in the game and so released no secrets. Maybe I just havent got to adding the page because something else cropped up..

Regardless, I already have the bakery room on my computer as part of the last Update. G5 has already released the data to me and a s a computer professional,  I can 'see' the information in the files it has given me. You might not be able to do that, but I can. So as far as I am concerned I have been given permission to talk about it.

Your Link to Googles "reporting content issues" mentions nothing about SSHM. If there is a "legal warning" to this group I would like to see it. Just because someone put those words in the 'guidelines' does not mean they are true.

As far as those guidlines are concerned they have been "slid" into place with out any ratification from the comunity as a whole. I for one reject them.

There is nothing wrong with red links, in fact it helps all editors to point out where content is missing. This notion that it has to be 100% complete is ridiculous. And all the admins have acknowledged that, by editing past "completed" pages. Sanese gave an example once about the French Wiki having the text "This is a fruit"  as its first entry for a piece of fruit (I forget which).

And anyway the links to the Cosmos Room and Film Studio were not even added by the person who made the room page. And so until I added the actual links about two weeks later on the "list of pictures"  no one could find the information unless they had a direct link.

Wikis work best from the inside outwards.. not starting at the outside and working in.

Also, given that this wiki has lost so many members who were/wish to edit, can you really afford to allienate more people who wish to contribute. Your call!

OHH, and GEL I said it once before and I will say it again..

I HAVE ABSOLUTLY NO INTEREST IN COLLECTING BADGES.