Thread:Goathouse/@comment-26581037-20190424015033/@comment-29082502-20190424030157

Thank you for your response 8. I am not a computer whiz and it took me 4 days to work out the timeline on all interactions in this issue. Hopefully you admins have a better system. Like a chronological log. With all due respect 8, I feel quite strongly that my concern was not addressed by the team. It is now the 23rd, and the problem began on the 17th; by my reconning, that is 6 days. I am surprised to have received a response from you, but I interpret it as being in good faith. I am aware, at this point, (after much fumbling on your site) of the timeline of inputs, at least what I was able to find publicly. I was particularly aware of someone repeatedly attempting to ring my alarm. I am also aware that yet another admin removed her response sometime after the removal of the pic and my posted response to it. The admin posted notification to her wall and then there was another apology involved. Why was admin continually apo!ogizing? She  also replied to my explanation to her wall, and then deleted not only my explanation to her, but her response to it. (As such I never received her snarky response and was unaware of it until I went looking to document the facts in the case.) If she had the power to delete my post on her wall, why did she not apply the same position to the pic? No, instead she defended the violator's honor, as if that were the issue. No matter the ToU; that was not the issue for her. The issue became her controlling the situation BECAUSE the offender was her friend. To that end, she tried to transfer the blame to me, by declaring I took the issue out of context. She condoned the use of a graphic portraying genitals accompanied by a rude remark. That goes beyond a lapse in judgement: it's a clear indictment of character in a situation where the issue is an obvious violation, purposefully covered up, all while flaming the ''whistleblower".  It is nepotism in motion. Once again I make a request for admin details on who was involved in the decisions being made. Surely you can understand why I want to know who-alls' ears have been receptive to her while I play mushroom/basically advised to shut up and go away? You tell me my silence is required in the interest of harmony, after different members of the admin team defend a ToU, help cover it up, and apologize to the guilty parties, all while I attempt, in good faith, to play by the rules?

Sorry 8, this doesn't even resemble equitability for me. I am Formally requesting that Gaia be held responsible for her action. I am Formally asking that Nessie's log is examined and that action be taken. I am Formally asking for Admin to publicy state that these matters constitute several giant stumbles, their actions were inconsistent with not just Fandom policy, but also with SSHM wiki policy. I would like to see Harmony here, too, 8. But not at the expense of my integrity. That is not for sale. If you must block me now, p!ease make it perfectly clear for which violations the penalty is administered. That is my last request.

Thank you for gremlin advice. I hope I won't need to resort to that.