Thread:MatsunoJo/@comment-29954643-20181025174549/@comment-35384125-20181025205750

Hi, MFB. Thank you very much for the links. I did wonder if I should contact you instead of GEL, and you were faster to reply. It looks like no one was really opposing the change, they just had a different approach to it or did not notice the slight differences between the two.

Like you note on your forum post, the list with pictures does not enable people only to search for a collection based on the name of a collection, but also to find the items or collections they need if they play the game in a different language. I have had to guess one of the English names in the collection to find the item or collection I was looking for.

I spent a lot of time reading the posts. The mock page looks clean and nice to edit. I really feel like adding the missing info from the old table now that I look at the source... I don't know what an overhead is, by the way.

// (a few minutes later) Oh, the temptation was too big so I already added a new row to your table. Wow, it really went smoothly!! Even without having the "|, <, >" characters available in my keyboard. I like it that in your version, the background color isn't err... what's the word in English... anyway, separately for each cell. That makes the code easier to figure out. I'll just replicate the beginning of each needed line (10 lines at a once), and then I'll just copy-paste from the current page and add some line breaks and boldings here and there, check and change the Collection number, and that's about it. And I still don't know what that difficult overhead is. (LOL)

I'm sorry, I think I'll edit the rest in before clicking Publish. May I? The table on the mock page could be finished first and then copied straight to the current official page to replace the current one, if the reluctance was about wanting to preserve page history. I've read some other old forum posts before, but this time I can symphatize with everyone.

MatsunoJo