Thread:Gaiasweetgirl/@comment-30544675-20190425185807

Gaia, you have been repeating your Point of View about previously-blocked members and ideas about their place or role in our community. Your POV is not getting traction and it seems that you are just re-stating it over and over until someone agrees with you. Any policy needs to be general enough that we shouldn’t have to have a discussion to revise it to cover a situation that doesn’t quite fit.

There is another recent situation with another member, who asked us to review the entire situation (not just your part in it.)  The admins see that you sometimes repeat your claims, and whether or not you are correct, it isn’t always taken well. Sometimes other members take it personally.

Consider these points as guidance:


 * 1) When the discussion resumes about the proposed admin policy, you may offer constructive criticism in the form of revising a sentence or a paragraph to improve it.  If your idea does not receive further discussion and/or is not implemented, move on.
 * 2) If another member is upset and you had something to do with it, apologize (or not) – and move on.
 * 3) Mentioning past members by name does not help to make your point.  The ones that remember know who you are talking about.  The newer members only become confused and may not participate.
 * 4) Repetitive posting without acknowledging or even considering another member's POV will put other members off.  This contributes to excluding others from participation in the wiki.

Continued badgering about an issue, or continuing to pick at another member,or dominating a conversation, may result in a Warning and continuation after a Warning may result in a Block per our Block Policy. 