Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-31677686-20180604064355/@comment-29954643-20180604081003

I feel that taking a direct line from wikipedia is better as a link on the word. You don't want to then repeat the first line again. Perhaps, use a dictionary like defintion. I use the search engine to get a more simple definition, especially in these cases.



One more comment. You might want to put a Notation of the Sources that you are using for the article. Anything where you used the wording word for word especially. I'm not sure how much is overkill on an article such as this. These are the ones that stand out as unusual object names to your ear (and many times mine as well). I am not the one to judge this though. Might want to ask for more input than just mine. Anyway, I love the page. Much better on a separate page from abbreviations. I applaud all your effort - El