Thread:Karendu1/@comment-34076922-20190216220909/@comment-29954643-20190218020056

Karendu1 wrote: El, I will make the same request of you that I made of Gaia. Can you point me in the direction of the post to which you are referring?

Thank you, Karen Honestly, there were so many posts by Gaia that I simply can't find the exact link number(s) (and that is saying something). But here is what I meant when I said that Gaia implied that I was a liar.

"You said... I, alone, got him blocked. I did not!! I was not the only person to contact Sanse. And I did not go around admin. I believe AAA's block was before I even posted to Sanse. Or, at best, it was an overlap in that time frame. No one expected his block. He was warned by two admin and his block was a surprise to all. At no time did I undermine ANY admin or their decisions. At no time did ANY admin contact me directly about his block.

You are entitled to your opinion but your facts are wrong. So either you chose to lie, or you choose not to see the truth.

Either way, I had nothing to do with his Fandom block."

Another Gaia comment about me: "Furthermore, the clause, if voted on to be changed, should be fair to everyone, not just who was blocked and why - so I see this as a policy vote, not a MFB vanity vote ."

And there were other allusions to my character.

Karen, I honestly still believe that Gaia did go around you five, who seemed to be clearly wanting for AAA to be able to start with a clean slate, but that he had stepped over the line. I know nothing about any off-wiki communications with Sannse. I knew ONLY that Gaia had gone to Sannse and AAA was blocked. I do apologize if she was not the only one that did not respect the admin's decision to merely WARN AAA.

But that is neither here nor there. I did not 'choose to lie', nor do I 'not see the truth'. AAA did get blocked because of his own post, and I accept your warning. It was a mistake and I do sometimes make them. As for Gaia and her 'feelings', well she hurt mine more than once in that thread, so if hurt feelings is grounds for a warning, then I am misunderstanding the current blocking policy. I care mostly about the ARTICLES anyway, as you know.

What I wish with all of my heart is that we ALL stop this off wiki slander. I cannot prove that it is occurring. I just know that it is happening to me now as it happened in the past.

Karen, there was a time when you were a moderator here when you believed me to be not guilty and that my block was unfounded. You were treated the same way by the same previous admins and you were pretty darn vocal (along with MD) back then. What I have posted about any current admin's post or policy was not deemed to be an offense, according to the current blocking policy.

Good Luck, Karen, finding the right way for the wiki to go FORWARD. I just didn't want me or anyone in the future be left behind because of off wiki chatter or popularity contest voting without knowing the full extend of the matter as it applied to me.

If we all agree to post on the wiki transparently, then we have far less to fear, but when someone is allowed to post on my wall that they are leaving the wiki because I am a cancer, Well, it was a lot to take and nothing whatsoever was done about that either. - El

P.S. You probably know that all five of you and me have been blocked forever from ever posting on what was Okapi's German wiki. This is the same thing that McQuester did to 4Paws and others during the TDC nonsense. There need be no 'boogie men' here, if we all stop gathering in off-wiki groups to grind a member up. The disruption meant on wikis really has to do with disruptive editing, not this silly chatter. Sorry, that is how I think and feel.