Thread:Redbeard99/@comment-27860632-20170613022940/@comment-29954643-20170624053443

@Bonnie, don't worry about all of that. Way more work than is at all necessary, but thanks fo r taking the time to make a suggestion. The 2 pages were merely Foss's 2013 event write-ups. The historical value of adding those two very appropriate images did not affect their historical value and the history of when those images were added are retained in that pages history anyway. It just seemed pretty petty,

It just simply isn't fun to edit content when you know that someone can just sweep in and remove your work with no discussion only an after the fact statement that it was done with a vague reference to editing guidelines that don't seem to exist anywhere.

I read much of what RB said below in his suggestions, and he took quite some time posing his suggestions that I thought extremely valid as well, but again, it appears that the past history must be maintained over the future develpment of the article content and the true purpose of the wiki as I see it and that is to help in playing the game NOW.

@Betty, while I do apologize for my tone in that previous statement, but when a member is consistently dismissed, sometimes one just has to stand up and say the truth and I just simply got tired of being messed with and feeling threatened. I know that you don't see it that way, but I do and I have feelings too. But, I do not believe that my statement rose to the level of either a 'temper tantrum' or 'flaming and I'm confused as to how having a differing opinion is considered a ToU Violation. I am not threatening or harassing anyone.

I see no reason to continue this discussion either. Our differening points of view have been stated. And I know that it is too late now, but I am a sorry that I made my statement directly pointed at particular individuals regardless of how I felt at the moment. - El