Thread:Katlovr/@comment-32899062-20180313011012/@comment-28519806-20180313234146

Mainframebabe wrote: I'm sensing quite of bit of 'ownership' here. There are other editors, including myself, that would prefer to see this done as information becomes available to us all. Calling 'dibs'? Be careful. While I applaud the inclusion of Kat in creating stubs, to be fair, none of the rest of us have ever been 'allowed' to do this in the past, so this is just a little bit of a warning here. And I don't mean any kind of threat. Only that 'some' may begin to feel that editing has once again become a sort of club. We need different types of styles to keep our content both up to date, and consistent to some degree, but not stagnating. There is an expression for too much of the 'same old'.

Perhaps a bit more mentoring is in order for those who have now, and in the past, considered themselves to be 'specialists' on some aspect of the wiki content. It can be quite difficult to 'let go', but it is for the good of the wiki as a whole going forward. Not meaning to say that the projects being discussed here won't be best done by those already involved in this discussion, but, like I said, this could become another 'slippery slope'.

Thank you, Kat, for unstubbing the remaining individual collections. - El Mainframe, no ownership is implied whatsoever in what has been requested. Three admins (so far) have agreed that I could create the List of Collections pages and stub them.

As for Update pages, if I create them I won’t be writing the whole thing, it will be a collaborative effort as it has been.

I suppose I’m at a loss to understand what you’re implying here other than you were first happy to know I’d edit again but now you’re complaining about it. Which is it?