Thread:MDbugs/@comment-29694704-20180423000604/@comment-26384327-20180424023451

MDbugs wrote: The policy of   blocked  not  being  able to serve has been  in  effect  for almost 2 years. Whether  the blocking policy being  voted  on  now  passes  or  not. That  policy  will  still be  in effect. Foss  had her  reasons  for establishing   her  policy. I am not going to go inside the mind of Foss, but I am reasonably certain that her intent was to ensure that a certain individual could not invade the Wiki and establish power, as they had done with several other Wiki's.

If she had known that members would be blocked for speaking their minds or would be judged singularly, I again am reasonably certain that she would not have made such a blanket policy. Hmmm, upon further thought, was it a policy? Or was it drafted for that particular occasion? It would seem to me that it was drafted for that particular occasion. So why is this current staff using that as a shield?

It is my belief that there are some who fear that when the time comes for voting in new admins, I might throw my hat into the ring. The fear is heightened knowing that I might get the required votes to succeed. Let me make one thing abundantly clear, I have no desire to do so.

So accept the fact that you erred in your thinking (it happens) and make the necessary correction.

Also, while I have your attention, would someone from the Admin staff please respond to my questions? I was under the impression that by having five (5) Admins, questions posed by a member or members of the community would not go unanswered.