Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-29205531-20170531032043/@comment-29954643-20170531051018

I think that this whole nominations process seems to morphed into something that it wasn't intended to be. It is my undertanding that we were using this nominations process simply to nominate (suggest support) for members outside of those already volunteering. Those that were suggested (nominated) could then accept, decline, or continue to consider the possibility and that a vote would take place where we will all be writing in our commented 'votes only' for those who had officially agreed to volunteer.

What their individual sysop designation might be will be determined later. I though, especially in terms of the role of bureaucrat.It is my opinion that we should throw our doors open to anyone who wants to volunteer. There need not be any specific show of support for anybody currerntly volunteering as that is not in question at this time, but showing support for those who have previously volunteered is certainly a wonderful gesture as they have spent so much of their time and contributed greatly.

I don't know, that's just what I had thought. As far as me, I am still considering and thank you for your support. It seems so strange that anyone willing to volunteer their time should be mistreated in any way. I hope that some of these comments hasn't caused others to not volunteer at all. :--(( - El.