Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-28424239-20180422025914/@comment-29954643-20180422035719

I agree that my use of the word 'manipulating' was too strong. And, no I don't think that you had malicious intent, just curiosity. The fault lay, IMO only, with the admins not realizing that they had already submitted the policy with the clause in it and were looking for open discussion among the rest of the community, I thought. Explaining the reasons or components as Podaci was appropriate though.

That discussion was open until a date and time, so this would have been the time for admins to determine if there was community consensus on the components of this policy. There were differing POVs on only a single point. It is a definite point of contention even among the few that commented at all. So for the admins to answer your question (pressed for more than the one time), they, in essence, may have unintentionally ended further discussion by others who have not voiced any opinion at all.

I know, I know, admins are also members, but you didn't ask for their vote (decision) from them as members. You asked explicitly more than once for the admins' answers. That is where the line was crossed. Yes, in my opinion. I respect your opinions too, but rarely do I agree with them.

BTW, I found your request here on my wall too aggressive. I don't take orders from anyone anymore. Still, I do understand your upset and apologize for that. - El