Thread:Mainframebabe/@comment-27860632-20170526213912/@comment-29954643-20170529043836

Hi there, MD, I am receiving various communications from friends concerned that I haven't accepted or declined the nomination to be considered for a sysop designation. I am feeling rushed, and I thought that I had until the 2nd to decide one way or another.

I only read that thread occasionally because I feel so slandered, whether deliberate or not, whether just paranoia or not. I can only say, that is how I feel.

I have not seen any other time frame on this that I need concern myself with. I had thought that the current idea is to add at least 2 or perhaps 3 members and decide which roles would best suit each later. I had thought that all those currently serving are already serving so they aren't a consideration at this stage. Has something changed or have I misunderstood something? I will continue to assess the situation, and look forward to some guidance from you.

I've also 'heard' that I may be banned before that time. It's just rumors and not fact, but if that is the case, I think that it might be better clarified so that I can consider my options. I don't know the rules about any of this, and I've never felt so on the defensive in my life before, but I think that letting me know my status as a full voting member needs some clarification.

Just to be clear, I have not 'hacked' anyone's email account, nor has mine been hacked. I had thought that my emails mght have been 'spoofed' that is all. This is not the same as having access to my email system, just a way of altering the 'sender' name so as to have it seem that it is coming from another email account. Sorry, if this sounded, in any way, condescending, I'm just trying to explain in the best way that I can. Thanks :--)) - El