Thread:Katlovr/@comment-32899062-20180313011012/@comment-29954643-20180313224900

I'm sensing quite of bit of 'ownership' here. There are other editors, including myself, that would prefer to see this done as information becomes available to us all. Calling 'dibs'? Be careful. While I applaud the inclusion of Kat in creating stubs, to be fair, none of the rest of us have ever been 'allowed' to do this in the past, so this is just a little bit of a warning here. And I don't mean any kind of threat. Only that 'some' may begin to feel that editiing has once become a sort of club. We need different types of styles to keep our content both up to date, and consistent to some degree, but not stagnating. There is an expression for too much of the 'same old'.

Perhaps a bit more mentoring is in order for those who have now, and in the past, considered themselves to be 'specialists' on some aspect of the wiki content. It can be quite difficult to 'let go', but it is for the good of the wiki as a whole going forward. Not meaning to say that the projects being discussed here won't be best done by those already involved in this discussion, but, like I said, this could become another 'slippery slope'.

Thank you, Kat, for unstubbing the remaining individual collections. - El