Thread:Podaci/@comment-28519806-20180322053722/@comment-29954643-20180322200116

@Podaci, Again, found on private walls. I understand your desire to limit input based on 'something', but this forum shopping is not what we all discussed prior to the new election. This is more of the 'exclusionary' and misleading interactions that are at the core of problems concerning 'transparency' here. Perhaps you are all running in too many directions at once. Accepting statements of fact that are not in actual fact true has been a problem here for a long time. Bring this to the community and ask for input. Yes, it might get long and dull, but I guarantee that after a while, regular (non editing) members will tire of reading these types of discussions. There may be many off point interruptions, but that is the way here if the thread is not well moderated.

In the technical business world, this process is called a 'Request for Information' (RFI) as opposed to a 'Request for Proposal' (RFP) and though this is a small project in comparison, the thought for this is the same. Get as many disparate answers to your RFI before proceeding to the next phase of the project life cycle which could be an RFP, but certainly before a design and it's implementation is put in place.

There is a wealth of knowledge in our member base that might be unknown to us here because these discussions keep getting hidden on private walls. This is a wiki 'global' issue and, therefore, must, of course, be within the admin purview, but discussion is important and will help to bring the community together as long as only factual informaiton is given. - El