Thread:Redbeard99/@comment-30544675-20180307135434/@comment-29205531-20180307155649

There are no convetions published.. They were just assumed by the previous admins. eg Collections   Cxxx,, where xxx is the collection number.. whether you think it should be as a player sees it in the game or how the game files list it is another question. Foss used the game files. I myself "made up" the artefacts naming conventions as there was none published. They previous method was too simple and I added the new pictues to be somewhat similar to the collections pictures. ie  A17 xxxxxx

for the categories of game pictures, both are valid depending on what it added. If its a CI on the picture, the Bakery is valid... if we are talking about the Amulet then Sweet venture is valid.. it depends entirly on what "level" the item talked about is. Remember the picture comes first the category comes second.

But it should not matter ,, as people add pages /pictures they will add categories.. Its up to the admins or anyone else to straighten these out later if people stray too far from the path. For instance if someone adds a category of Sweet cakes to a Bakery item, that might be getting too specific.

if its on a personal blog, it does not count.. THat is private space and just personal thoughts.